The 2026 World Cup showcased the beauty of soccer, uniting diverse cultures and sparking vital discussions about the sport's role in society. However, the aftermath took a controversial turn when FIFA president Gianni Infantino proposed a $20 billion privatization plan for the World Cup, backed by JP Morgan and Thrive Capital. This move, resembling tactics from the Trump administration, threatens to skew funding towards football associations that support Infantino while sidelining those that oppose him.

Infantino’s increasing authoritarianism is evident as he disregards FIFA’s governance principles, operating more like a dictator than a democratic leader. Key decisions, including the privatization scheme, were announced without proper consultation, igniting concerns over transparency and fairness within FIFA. Despite his controversial actions, Infantino remains a frontrunner in the upcoming elections, bolstered by support from the Confederation of African Football (CAF) and some regional associations.

The entrenched patronage system within FIFA fosters loyalty among football associations, complicating efforts to challenge Infantino’s leadership. Many federations, despite recognizing the risks of privatization to players and clubs, continue to support the initiative due to financial incentives.

Potential successors to Infantino face their own controversies, making it difficult to envision a smoother transition. Figures like Victor Montagliani and Nasser Al-Khelaifi carry baggage, while Lise Klaveness, despite her principled stance, faces significant barriers due to systemic sexism within FIFA.

Recognizing the urgent need for external oversight, organizations like FairSquare have launched campaigns to hold Infantino accountable, advocating for reforms that prioritize the integrity of the sport. The situation underscores the necessity for independent regulation, ensuring that FIFA aligns with its foundational principles and serves the global football community.